May 18, 2009
Notre Dame, “Common Ground”, And The Unasked Question
We compromise the unborn and Abortion Incorporated will say ok
Barack Rodney King Obama just wants us to all get along. On record, throughout his political career, as a completely unrestricted abortion on demand zealot, and now fulfilling the wildest dreams of the abortion industry that gave their all to put him in the White House, Mr Obama yesterday piously proclaimed his heartfelt longing for both sides on the struggle for (and against) life to come together on “common ground”.
Disgracefully honored by the hierarchy of a formally prestigious Catholic University, President Obama, an accomplished master of duplicity, made maximum use of the opportunity afforded him. As was easily predicted in Say It Ain’t So Father, the occasion was manipulated by the president, and spun for every last ounce of propaganda by the Abortion Incorporated and the distant left to further cloud the Catholic Church’s once irrefutable position on abortion in the eyes of Catholic voters. Pelosi, Biden and Kerry must still be laughing.
The threads of this distasteful dog and pony show run far and deep. But let’s focus on the one, pointedly unasked, question that was central to the whole Notre Dame charade.
What, exactly, is this lofty common ground we should strive for Mr President?
What points should be mutually acceptable in the struggle on behalf of the over one million American children whose lives will be terminated, in the most barbaric, painful fashions imaginable, over the coming year? Exactly how many small mangled bodies tossed into Abortion Incorporated’s dumpsters should we agree on- just to show we can get all get along in Barack Obama’s America?
The fluff and the farce
In answer, the well worn red herrings are promptly blabbered out. “Working to reduce the number of abortions” and “working to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies”. All to the media’s sighs of admiration and accolades for the man’s wisdom, understanding and compassion. Solomon Obama.
These pat phrases are equivalent to a Miss America contestant stating she will “work for the good of children and world peace” if she wins. Nobody really knows what it means. Because it doesn’t mean anything. All bull feathers and fluff to snow the judges.
The president’s words on the subject of abortion should be taken with the same single grain of salt as his high minded discourses on “fiscal responsibility”. Those who truly care about the fate of the unborn children in our country need to close their ears to the empty rhetoric and judge Mr Obama’s true intentions by his acts- his voting record over the years and his policies as our president.
The facts
As an Illinois legislator Barack Obama was the only voice of opposition to the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, passed to protect the lives of babies who somehow survived an abortion, and to prohibit the “procedure” of intentionally inducing premature birth and leaving the baby to die for lack of medical care. The latter a common way to dispose of Downs Syndrome and other severally handicapped children (what God must think of us). “What we are doing here is to create one more burden on women, and I can’t support that.” So said the man honored by Notre Dame University.
During the primaries, Michelle Obama personally wrote to every major pro-abortion group promising that husband Barack would be their man on the “Freedom Of Choice Act”. And the many tentacles of Abortion Incorporated responded lavishly with millions of dollars in contributions and promises of millions of votes. Pro-Choice darling Hillary Clinton was suddenly shut out. Sweet Barack became the heartthrob of every NOW babe, Planned Parenthood’s father of the year, winner of NARAL’s public service award and number one on EMILY’s list. Organizations well known for their heartfelt eagerness to reach “common ground” on abortion and “reduce the number of abortions in America”.
On the rare occasions the media would broach candidate Obama on the issue of abortion, one face would promptly recite the meaningless “hope to reduce the number of abortions” stump response, while the other gave an FOCA wink and a nod to the benefactors he had sold himself to. And enough voters, who morally or in concert with their religious beliefs, should have known better, brought the “reduce the number” pig in a poke to win the election for Abortion Incorporated’s brought and paid for “messiah”.
As our president, Barack Obama has worked to reduce the number of abortions by reinstating the Mexico City policy, by which American tax dollars are now funding abortions world-wide. As our president, Barack Obama has renewed US contributions, beginning with 50 million dollars, to the UN Population Fund which distributes money for “population control” including forced abortions and sterilizations in China.
As our president, Barack Obama signed an executive order providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, despite overwhelming scientific evidence that it accomplishes nothing (zero successful treatments or therapies) other than (1) the destruction of human embryos and (2) reinforcement of the abortion industry’s classification God’s children in the womb as meaningless blobs of tissue, suitable for any use man sees fit. Incredibly, Mr Obama simultaneously revoked a 2007 executive order that encouraged the National Institutes of Health to intensify adult stem cell research, which has produced 80 successful treatments and therapies, without requiring the destruction of a human embryo.
Our president is currently paving the way for “common ground” by attempting to weaken laws which protect health providers from being forced to perform procedures that would be in violation of their consciences or religious beliefs.
The “common ground”
Not once during his lofty speech at Notre Dame did President Obama even hint at the possibility of rethinking his hard core pro-abortion record, positions, policies or passionate commitment to passage of the Freedom Of Choice Act. So how is this “common ground” to be achieved?
By surrender. Barack Obama’s definition of bi-partisanship. If the defenders of America’s most helpless citizens would only abandon these meaningless tissue growths to the vacuums, surgical shears and poisons of Abortion Incorporated, our country could finally reach the idyllic common ground our insightful president longs to bring us together on.
Solomon Obama indeed. Just cut the babies in half.
![]()
Filed under Right To Life vs The Obama Administration by The Radiant Cross Staff
Leave a Comment